Close Menu
Pet Business World
  • Trade News
    • Distributors
    • International
    • Legislation
    • Manufacturers
    • Other trades
    • Retailers
  • New Products
    • Birds
    • Cats
    • Dogs
    • Small Animals
  • Features
    • Industry Experts
    • Retailer profiles
  • Aquatics
  • Columnists
    • Newshound
    • Reptile Trade Views
  • People
  • Magazines
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
  • Classifieds
  • Trade Directory
  • Advertise
  • Email Newsletters
  • Subscribe
Facebook X (Twitter)
  • FREE Email Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Free Magazine Subscriptions
X (Twitter) Facebook
Pet Business World
  • Trade News
    • Distributors
    • International
    • Legislation
    • Manufacturers
    • Other trades
    • Retailers
  • New Products
    • Birds
    • Cats
    • Dogs
    • Small Animals
  • Features
    • Industry Experts
    • Retailer profiles
  • Aquatics
  • Columnists
    • Newshound
    • Reptile Trade Views
  • People
  • Magazines
    1. March 2026
    2. February 2026
    3. January 2026
    4. December 2025
    5. November 2025
    6. October 2025
    7. September 2025
    Featured

    PBW News – March 2026

    By David ReesMarch 10, 2026
    Recent

    PBW News – March 2026

    March 10, 2026

    PBW News – February 2026

    February 10, 2026

    PBW News – January 2026

    January 12, 2026
  • Classifieds
  • Trade Directory
Pet Business World
Other trades

Puppy farmers’ jailed

Michele SwalesBy Michele SwalesJune 28, 20193 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Michael Rushmer (27), of Low Road, Thurlton, appeared at Norwich Crown Court on Tuesday June 25) for sentencing after previously pleading guilty to two offences of conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation.

Jacob Murphy (27) and Zoe Rushmer (26), both of The Street, Norton Subcourse; and Jean Boyes (67), of The Street, Bramerton, also appeared in court for sentencing, having all admitted one offence of conspiracy to commit fraud.

The RSPCA launched an investigation into puppy-selling in Norfolk and Suffolk after a series of calls from members of the public who had bought puppies that had soon fallen ill and, in some cases, died. The animal charity was made aware of more than 60 victims.

Officers made a number of visits to a farm in Norfolk during late 2016 and early 2017 and gave advice but, when the scale of the problem became apparent, the charity approached Norfolk Police for assistance and a warrant was executed at the property, in Low Road, Thurlton, in August 2017.

PROFIT

Lead investigator RSPCA Inspector Amy Pellegrini described the farm as a ‘puppy factory’. “Our investigations suggested that multiple litters of puppies were being bred and then advertised for sale,” she said. “Other litters appear to have been purchased and sold on at profit. The way the adverts were worded suggested to prospective purchasers that these were litters of home-bred puppies in good health and were well-socialised.

“The reality, sadly, was far from it and the sellers were running a commercial, unlicensed puppy farm on an industrial scale. Unfortunately, many buyers ended up with very sick puppies.”

A total of 74 dogs and puppies were removed under the warrant and taken into RSPCA care. Several of the pregnant bitches went on to have a further 20 puppies but one soon died, leaving a total of 93 dogs. The dogs – a mixture of breeds including cockapoos, labradoodles, Yorkies, Chihuahuas, shih tzus, schnauzers and Chinese cresteds – remain in RSPCA care.

UNSUSPECTING

Amy added: “Not only was the welfare of these dogs seriously compromised, but many unsuspecting members of the public were also caught up in this operation, conned and left heartbroken or paying off large vet bills.

“Families thought they were buying puppies who had been bred and reared in loving family homes but in reality they had been bred in disgusting conditions with little regard for their health or welfare but simply how much money they would bring in.”

This week, two members of the gang were jailed while a third was given a suspended sentence.

Michael Rushmer, Zoe Rushmer and Jacob Murphy were all disqualified from keeping dogs for life; Michael and Murphy were sentenced to 3.5 years in prison; and Zoe Rushmer was given a two-year prison term, suspended for two years. She was also ordered to complete 250 hours of unpaid work.

Jean Boyes was given a two-year conditional discharge.

 

 

Previous ArticlePet retailer gains award for people focus
Next Article Win a taste of Yorkshire hospitality
Michele Swales

Read Similar Stories

Other trades

Clumber Spaniel Bruin takes top spot at Crufts

March 9, 2026
Other trades

Experts uncover why cats are prone to kidney disease

March 6, 2026
Other trades

Scottish vet group becomes employee-owned

March 6, 2026
Most Read

British brands prepare for Interzoo exhibition

March 13, 2026

PIF welcomes plan to help exports for UK pet businesses

March 13, 2026

Pets at Home to open four new outlets this month

March 12, 2026
© 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions

  • OvertheCounter
  • Pest Magazine

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Pet Business World
Managing Your Privacy

To provide the best digital experience, we use cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to our use of cookies allows us to process data such as reading behaviour. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
Cookie Preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}