Close Menu
Pet Business World
  • Trade News
    • Distributors
    • International
    • Legislation
    • Manufacturers
    • Other trades
    • Retailers
  • New Products
    • Birds
    • Cats
    • Dogs
    • Small Animals
  • Features
    • Industry Experts
    • Retailer profiles
  • Aquatics
  • Columnists
    • Newshound
    • Reptile Trade Views
  • People
  • Magazines
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
  • Classifieds
  • Trade Directory
  • Advertise
  • Email Newsletters
  • Subscribe
Facebook X (Twitter)
  • FREE Email Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Free Magazine Subscriptions
X (Twitter) Facebook
Pet Business World
  • Trade News
    • Distributors
    • International
    • Legislation
    • Manufacturers
    • Other trades
    • Retailers
  • New Products
    • Birds
    • Cats
    • Dogs
    • Small Animals
  • Features
    • Industry Experts
    • Retailer profiles
  • Aquatics
  • Columnists
    • Newshound
    • Reptile Trade Views
  • People
  • Magazines
    1. March 2026
    2. February 2026
    3. January 2026
    4. December 2025
    5. November 2025
    6. October 2025
    7. September 2025
    Featured

    PBW News – March 2026

    By David ReesMarch 10, 2026
    Recent

    PBW News – March 2026

    March 10, 2026

    PBW News – February 2026

    February 10, 2026

    PBW News – January 2026

    January 12, 2026
  • Classifieds
  • Trade Directory
Pet Business World
Legislation

XL bully ban to remain in force after legal challenge fails

David ReesBy David ReesDecember 18, 20243 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
American XL bully
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Campaigners have failed in their legal bid to overturn the ban on the XL bully breed in England and Wales.

The group Don’t Ban Me, Licence Me had been granted the right to a judicial review of the ban, which took effect in February 2024, after arguing that the ban was unlawful and would only affect responsible dog owners.

In a judgement, Mrs Justice Beverley Lang dismissed most of the legal challenge, saying there was “sufficient evidence of an alarmingly high level of fatal attacks” by XL bullies or XL bully crossbreeds. She maintained that issues including defining the right types of dog and the human impacts of euthanasia had been properly considered by Defra.

She said: “In my view, it was rational for the defendant to assess and act upon the available evidence on dog attacks and fatalities”, adding that it wasn’t necessary to delay the imposition of the ban until an official definition of the breed was prepared.

Lang also said she had been shown data for 11 deaths between January 2020 and September 2023 at the hearing. She explained: “Suffice it to say that, even excluding those cases where there was legitimate doubt as to whether an XL bully was involved, there was sufficient evidence of an alarmingly high level of fatal attacks by XL bullies or XL bullies crossbreeds to justify the defendant’s concerns.”

The campaigners did succeed on one point of their challenge, with the judge finding the government failed to comply with public sector equality rules in its assessments in September and October 2023. However, Lang ruled that there was no further action needed as a “comprehensive and lawful” quality assessment had taken place in May.

The RSPCA issued a response to the findings.

Dr Samantha Gaines, RSPCA lead on dog control, said: “The Judge has found that although the UK Government did breach their duty under the Equality Act, the decision to ban the XL bully was not unlawful and the ban will not be over-turned.

“While we’re bitterly disappointed with this outcome, we commend the Don’t Ban Me, Licence Me group for all of their hard work and for taking a stand to speak out for XL bullies and their owners.

“We will continue to call for this approach to dog control to be reviewed and replaced. To make a real difference to public safety and properly protect dog welfare, we need a complex approach which is backed by robust evidence.”

Previous ArticleKormotech secures €40 million funding to expand production
Next Article Inventor Cat wins business award for Dental Wand
David Rees

David Rees is the editor of PBW News. In a 30-year career in trade journalism he has specialised in the retail and wholesale sectors, holding senior positions at a number of leading titles.

Read Similar Stories

Legislation

PIF welcomes food safety guidance about raw food

February 11, 2026
Legislation

Government seeks to reform vet sector

January 30, 2026
Legislation

Steep rise in under-20s minimum wage announced

November 27, 2025
Most Read

Pets at Home to open four new outlets this month

March 12, 2026

Bella+Duke teams up with James Martin

March 12, 2026

PATS New Product Awards programme to be expanded

March 12, 2026
© 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions

  • OvertheCounter
  • Pest Magazine

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Pet Business World
Managing Your Privacy

To provide the best digital experience, we use cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to our use of cookies allows us to process data such as reading behaviour. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
Cookie Preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}