Close Menu
Pet Business World
  • Trade News
    • Distributors
    • International
    • Legislation
    • Manufacturers
    • Other trades
    • Retailers
  • New Products
    • Birds
    • Cats
    • Dogs
    • Small Animals
  • Features
    • Industry Experts
    • Retailer profiles
  • Aquatics
  • Columnists
    • Newshound
    • Reptile Trade Views
  • People
  • Magazines
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
  • Classifieds
  • Trade Directory
  • Advertise
  • Email Newsletters
  • Subscribe
Facebook X (Twitter)
  • FREE Email Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Free Magazine Subscriptions
X (Twitter) Facebook
Pet Business World
  • Trade News
    • Distributors
    • International
    • Legislation
    • Manufacturers
    • Other trades
    • Retailers
  • New Products
    • Birds
    • Cats
    • Dogs
    • Small Animals
  • Features
    • Industry Experts
    • Retailer profiles
  • Aquatics
  • Columnists
    • Newshound
    • Reptile Trade Views
  • People
  • Magazines
    1. February 2026
    2. January 2026
    3. December 2025
    4. November 2025
    5. October 2025
    6. September 2025
    7. August 2025
    Featured

    PBW News – February 2026

    By David ReesFebruary 10, 2026
    Recent

    PBW News – February 2026

    February 10, 2026

    PBW News – January 2026

    January 12, 2026

    PBW News – December 2025

    December 9, 2025
  • Classifieds
  • Trade Directory
Pet Business World
Legislation

No government U-turn on XL bully ban despite public petitions

David ReesBy David ReesNovember 29, 20233 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
American XL bully
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

The government has confirmed it will not repeal breed-specific measures in the Dangerous Dogs Act, and that the ban on XL bully breed-types will be enacted in the new year as planned, despite a huge public response to petitions against the legislation.

From December 31 it will be against the law to breed or sell XL bully breed-types in England and Wales, while from February 1, 2024, it will be illegal to be in possession of one unless owners have a certificate of exemption. More than 600,000 people have put their name to a petition opposing the inclusion of XL bullies in the Act, while more than 100,000 signed a separate one calling for a rethink of the entire legislative framework for dangerous dogs. The numbers were sufficient in both cases to trigger a formal debate in Westminster, which took place on Monday evening (November 27).

During the debate, Food, Farming and Fisheries Minister Mark Spencer, said that there had been an increase in serious and fatal dog attacks in recent years, and that “the XL bully breed-type appears to have been disproportionately involved in that rise in attacks.”

He continued: “We recognise the strength of feeling on breed-specific legislation, and that some people are opposed to the prohibition of specific breed-types. However, the Government must balance those views with our responsibility to protect public safety. We remain concerned that lifting any restrictions may result in more dog attacks. Therefore, there are no plans to repeal the breed-specific provisions in the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.”

The well-attended debate, which ran for more than two hours, featured contributions from a number of MPs from both sides of the house, including Dr Thérèse Coffey, who was the Secretary of State responsible for adding XL bullies to the prohibited list when the announcement was made in October.

She defended the legislation, saying that “a lot of care and attention has been given to the detail”, and revealed that she had received “several death threats” since initiating the ban.

Neil Hudson, MP for Penrith and The Border, supported the ban but raised concerns from within the veterinary community about the implications of euthanising pet dogs and called for an extension to the legislation’s neutering deadline in order to ease vets’ workload.

He also called for “a longer piece of work to be done in parallel with this short-term legislation.”

Hudson added: “We need to look at responsible breeding, responsible dog ownership, responsible training and responsible socialising of those animals, and we need to tackle some of the issues that have been raised, such as the iniquitous existence of puppy farms and unscrupulous breeders.”

The government could yet face a legal challenge to the legislation, as campaigners are seeking a judicial review.

Previous ArticleGlee exhibition opts for new September date
Next Article Fold Hill mourns passing of owner James Grant
David Rees

David Rees is the editor of PBW News. In a 30-year career in trade journalism he has specialised in the retail and wholesale sectors, holding senior positions at a number of leading titles.

Read Similar Stories

Legislation

PIF welcomes food safety guidance about raw food

February 11, 2026
Legislation

Government seeks to reform vet sector

January 30, 2026
Legislation

Steep rise in under-20s minimum wage announced

November 27, 2025
Most Read

New treats line to support retired police dogs

March 4, 2026

Pets to take their place in Italian design showcase

March 4, 2026

Natural VetCare brand relaunched in UK

March 2, 2026
© 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions

  • OvertheCounter
  • Pest Magazine

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Pet Business World
Managing Your Privacy

To provide the best digital experience, we use cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to our use of cookies allows us to process data such as reading behaviour. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
Cookie Preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}